• Home
  • About
  • The Pimlico Kid
  • Contact

‘Due to’ or ‘owing to’?

Posted 08/01/15

Back in the mists of time (at school), I remember having the difference between ‘owing to’ and ‘due to’ explained quite clearly. I raise the distinction because the shorter-to-print and quicker-to-say ’due to’ seems to be driving ‘owing to’ close to extinction. Have you seen many signs using ‘owing to’ recently?

My English teacher said that one way of helping decide which one to use is to substitute ‘owing to’ with ‘because of’ and to replace ‘due to’ with ‘caused by’.

Examples:

The train was late owing to (because of) rain. Quite nice.

The train was late due to (caused by) rain. Not so nice.

The late arrival was due to (caused by) rain. Quite nice.

The late arrival was owing to (because of) rain.  Not quite so nice.

Owing to (because of ) rain, the match was cancelled. Quite nice.

Due to (caused by) rain, the match was cancelled. Not nice.

Does it matter any more now that the expressions seem interchangeable? After all, using ‘due to’ doesn’t materially change the meaning. And as long as everyone knows what is meant, why go on about it?

I do so for the sake of a little more variety, a tad more elegance – and owing to an abiding affection for a great English teacher.

  • Tweet

Categories : Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Claire King says:
    August 2, 2015 at 11:46 am

    Dear Barry, Please realise that we are all counting on you to stand tall in ongoing efforts to maintain standards of elegance in the English language. We are lucky, owing to the numerous influences on our language, to have these kinds of nuances to play with in our speech and in writing. So many other languages lack the richness of expression that we often take for granted. I am happy to see that, due to the diligence and enthusiasm of your teacher, you do not.
    Claire x

    Reply
  2. Claire King says:
    August 2, 2015 at 11:48 am

    😉

    Reply
    • Barry says:
      August 3, 2015 at 12:40 pm

      Thank you Claire. I appreciate that if one is to be a bit of a pedant, one has to be a whole lot more realistic about language change; a little like Canute sitting on his throne not to show that he could stop the tide coming in but that he couldn’t. Your ‘due to’ made me laugh out loud! Every good wish. Barry

      Reply
  3. Brenda Woodford says:
    August 5, 2015 at 9:26 am

    Hi Barry,

    This post is helpful. I can’t recall whether I needed to use either in my present Wip. The examples you give are so clear.
    Owing to your examples I will, in the future, be ever diligent.

    All best,
    Bren

    Reply
  4. Andrew Blackman says:
    September 5, 2018 at 9:07 pm

    Hi Barry
    I spent some time this morning scrolling through all your old posts on my phone, and it made me wish you’d kept this blog going. There’s such a good mix of thoughts on books, observations on life, posts on language and more. I understand why you stopped, though—it’s so hard to find the time, and the creative writing has to come first. To be honest, I’d rather read another novel from you than some more blog posts. How are you doing with the writing?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Most recent posts

  • Au revoir Twitter and Facebook November 30, 2015
  • ‘Due to’ or ‘owing to’? August 1, 2015
  • Objects of love and memory February 8, 2015
  • Snow – and men of a certain age February 3, 2015
  • ‘Home town’ review for The Pimlico Kid December 11, 2013

Monthly archives

  • November 2015
  • August 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • November 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • November 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Search posts on a particular subject

Blogs I follow

Andrew Blackman
Isabel Costello
Emma Darwin
Amanda Jennings
Claire King
Roz Morris
Scott Pack
Stephanie Zia

Barry Walsh
Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved
Site by Bookwebs